Conspiracy Theories, Part 9287
I’m in a meeting now, learning all about the software program that runs all the market research for the Magazine I work for. Ya know, along the lines of the information machine that generates the statistical miracle that claims Volkswagen owners tend to like Skippy peanut butter. It’s the very tool that arms corporate America with the idiosyncrasies of our individuality, so they can tailor their marketing to manipulate us into purchasing their indigenously crafted, overly-priced product. I’m still deciding on if I think this kind of egregious mind fucking is fair, after all, I believe in free trade and being successful at what you do by making the best of it. However, it is a question of where our choices and freedom end and corporate or governmental (what’s the difference) control takes over.
I am often skeptical of any involuntary disclosure of my personal preferences, but how personal is it, REALLY? Most of the numbers are a projection onto a larger audience. On the other hand, I never joined the damn grocery club down the street. I did not want them logging my purchases and associating them with the application they enticed me to fill out as greedy fantasies of winning that lamebrain SUVs and shopping sprees were swarming about my gray matter. Never mind the outrageous taxes I’d have to pay up upon receipt of my prize. Never mind the improbability of actually winning some fixed drawing. And never mind that the information collected when I shop and use the club card is worth thousands of dollars every time I save 50 cents on a can of artichokes. They don’t make the cash on me—I’m not giving them any real money; they slap my demographic up against my purchasing habits and make money marketing to others like me. Or, they can input my info into a huge GIS (Geographical Information System) so the next time Reynolds’s need to find new customers, they know that at my address, I buy the generic brand—which by definition means I’m asking—no—begging them for their branded propaganda.
Even if they don’t do this, they should. It’s a pretty good idea.
On a similar note, I wonder, sometimes whether marijuana if was made illegal because it is known to shrink the fat cells which, mind you, constitutes your brain. So during development, kids think it’s a rebellious act to smoke and toke themselves into apathy and ignorance. Then domestic anti-terrorist organizations do not have to worry about them in the future. It makes sense since young rebellions turn into old ones—unless you do something about it first. Also consider that a bulk of the drug culture is built around disgruntled youth just trying to find themselves. Conveniently drug use is blatantly rebellious and it’s so cool to be a rebel.
If drugs really do have this debilitating effect on people, were the theories suggesting the CIA contributed to the crack problem in poor neighborhoods just paranoid fantasies? People already burdened to the point of collapse, desperately needing escape; even driven to the furious anguish to contest the status quo? Perhaps one could argue lack of the necessity for CIA intervention, but why isn’t it plausible? President Clinton basically admitted the mistreatment of syphilis infected prisoners by publicly apologizing, so why would a crack experiment be unlikely? Environmental racism is alive and well today, incinerators and industrial complexes conveniently placed in poor neighborhoods and sadly, there is little mainstream acknowledgement.
I’m asking Middle America a question. “What the hell are you doing?” They must have their thumb up their collective ass. Everyone whines about the Holocaust and Hitler, Mussolini, and even slavery—but what about it? I’m all sad it happened too. I’ll watch the movies and go to the memorials. But do we find comfort from this stuff being in the past?
News Flash: It’s not just in the past. It’s in Bosnia, Rwanda, Afghanistan, Africa, and Burma. It’s in southern Louisiana. It’s in New York City. Need I go on?
The world is quite violent when considering how people are poisoned daily with industrial pollutants, driven to suicide, or self-inflicted wounds via narcotics or even forced slavery (be it sweat shops in Mexico or what have you). But when speaking of violence in this century, does our rhetoric weigh heavily on these situations? Hell no! We’re talking about things like guns in middle class schools.
This school shooting upheaval aggravates me beyond belief. Hardly any reporter or commentator out there addressed the bully problem with exception of Charles Groden, and even then his producers were scared to death of him saying anything about it directly (we could also refer to it as “tact”), so they did it with visuals. These kids with guns are tormented and abused by other kids who are neglected and over-compensating for who knows what all. These little children and their precious souls are being battered and ignored and all we grown ups can say is, “where on earth did they get those guns?!” Has anyone publicly pointed out how asinine it is to worry about guns when the problem is obviously more painfully deep than that, and been heard saying it?
When reflecting upon human history, by no stretch of the imagination can one say that it’s more physically violent these days either. Go back to the old west where gunfights were regular as were and trials with no jury. Go back a little farther and picture gladiator days with men fighting to their deaths and virgins being slaughtered in front of an approving audience—let’s call it snuff theatre. There are hundreds more examples that only point to the fact that…. Things ain’t all that bad nowadays.
It is viable to state that we are in a time of more twisted psychological abuse. Whether it’s organized, some concoction by “the man,” or some freak coincidence. It is not very probable, but hey, I’m bored watching TV.
November 28th, 2005 at 8:27 p
Program on the emergence of civilization.
“14 species of large animals capable of domesitcation in the history of mankind.
13 from Europe, Asia and northern Africa.
None from the sub-Saharan African continent. ”
Favor.
And disfavor.
They point out Africans’ failed attempts to domesticate the elephant and zebra, the latter being an animal they illustrate that had utmost importance for it’s applicability in transformation from a hunting/gathering to agrarian-based civilization.
The roots of racism are not of this earth.
Austrailia, aboriginals:::No domesticable animals.
The North American continent had none. Now 99% of that population is gone.
AIDS in Africa.
Organizational Heirarchy/Levels of positioning.
Heirarchical order, from top to bottom:
1. MUCK - perhaps have experienced multiple universal contractions (have seen multiple big bangs), creator of the artificial intelligence humans ignorantly refer to as “god”
2. Perhaps some mid-level alien management
3. Evil/disfavored aliens - runs day-to-day operations here and perhaps elsewhere
Terrestrial management/positioning:
4. Chinese/egyptians - this may be separated into the eastern and western worlds
5. Romans -
6. Mafia - the real-world 20th century interface that constantly turns over generationally so as to reinforce the widely-held notion of mortality
7. Jews, corporation, women, politician - Evidence exisits to suggest mafia management over all these groups.
Movies foreshadowing catastrophy
1985 James Bond View to a Kill 1989 San Francisco Loma Prieta earthquake.
Our society gives clues to the system in place. We all have heard the saying “He has more money than god.” There is also an episode of the Simpsons where god meets Homer and says “I’m too old and rich for this.”
This is the system on earth because this is the system everywhere.
I don’t want to suggest the upper eschelons are evil and good is the fringe.
But they have made it abundantly clear that doing business with evil (disfavored) won’t help people. They say only good would have the ear, since evil is struggling for survival, and therefore only the favored could help.
The clues are there which companies are favored and which are disfavored, but they conceal it very hard because it is so crucial.
I offer an example of historical proportions:::
People point to Walmart and cry “anti-union”.
Unions enable disfavored people to live satisfactorly without addressing their disfavor. This way their family’s problems are never resolved. Without the union they would have to accept the heirarchy, their own inferiority.
Unions serve to empower.
Walmart is anti-union because they are good. They try to help people address and resolve their problems by creating an enviornment where there are fewer hurdles.
Media ridicule and lawsuits are creations to reinforce people’s belief that Walmart is evil in a subsegment of the indistry dominated by the middle and lower classes.
Low-cost disfavored Chinese labor is utilized by corporate america to maximize margins. They all do it. Only WalMart gets fingered because they are the ones who help, and those who seek to create confusion in the marketplace want to eliminate the vast middle class who have a real chance and instead stick with lower classes who may not work otherwise. So they dirty him up while allowing the others to appear clean.
The middle class is being deceived. They are being misled into the unfavored, and subsequently will have no assistance from their purchases with corporate america.
I believe the coining of the term “Uncle Sam” was a clue alluding to just this::Sam Walton and WalMart is one of few saviors of the peasant class.
Amercia is a country of castoffs, rejects. Italy sent its criminals, malcontents.
Between the thrones, the klans and kindred, they “decided” who they didn’t want and acted, creating discontent and/or starvation.
The u.s. is full of disfavored rejects. It is the reason for the myriad of problems not found in European countries. As far as the Rockafellers and other industrialists of the 19th century go, I suspect these aren’t their real names. I suspect they were chosen to go and head this new empire.
Royalty is the right way to organize a society. Dictatorships and monarchies are a reflection of the antient’s hierarchical organization.
Positions go to those who have favor with the rulers, as opposed to being elected.
Elections bring a false sense of how the world is. Democracy misleads people.
Which is why the disfavored rejects were sent to the shores of America::To keep them on the wrong path.
Jews maim the body formed in the image of “god”, and inflicted circumsision upon all other white people, as well as the evil that is Jesus Christ.
I think about how Jews (were used to) created homosexuality among Slavics, retribution for the Holocaust.
Then I think of the Catholic Church and its troubles.
What connection is here between Jews and the Catholic church???
If it is their sinister motives that’s behind the evil that is Jesus Christ are they being used at all?
Perhaps it is them who are pulling strings.
Their centuries of slavery in Egypt proves their disfavor.
The Jew leaders decided to prey on the up-and-coming Europeans to try to fix their problems with the ruling elite, a recurring aspect of the elite’s methodology.
Jesus Christ is a religious figure of evil. The seperatist churches formed so they could still capture the rest of the white people, keeping them worshipping the wrong god.
And now they do it to people of color, Latinos and Asians, after centuries of preying upon them.
Since Buddism doesn’t recongnize a god, the calls are never heard, and Chinese representation is instead selected by the thrones.
Budda was the Asian’s Jesus Christ::: bad for the people. “They came up at the same time for a reason.”
Simpson’s foreshadowing::Helloween IV special, Flanders is Satan. “Last one you ever suspect.”
“You’ll see lots of nuns where you’re going:::hell!!!” St. Wigham, Helloween VI, missionary work, destroying cultures.
Over and over, the Simpsons was a source of education and enlightenment, a target of ridicule by the system which wishes to conceal its secrets.
I believe Islam is the one true religion, and those misled christians who attack “god”’s most favored people will pay dearly one day.